<?xml version="1.0"?>
<Articles JournalTitle="International Journal of Occupational Hygiene">
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>Tehran University of Medical Sciences</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>International Journal of Occupational Hygiene</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>2008-5109</Issn>
      <Volume>17</Volume>
      <Issue>1</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
        <Year>2025</Year>
        <Month>03</Month>
        <Day>03</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <title locale="en_US">Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment in a Carpentry Workshop: A Case Study</title>
    <FirstPage>26</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>32</LastPage>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Mahdi</FirstName>
        <LastName>Jafari Nodoushan</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">0000-0002-9238-5694</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Mostafa</FirstName>
        <LastName>Jafari Zaveh</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">0000-0002-5655-8455</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Ali</FirstName>
        <LastName>Jafari</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">0000-0003-3689-2699</affiliation>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <History>
      <PubDate PubStatus="received">
        <Year>2024</Year>
        <Month>10</Month>
        <Day>11</Day>
      </PubDate>
      <PubDate PubStatus="accepted">
        <Year>2024</Year>
        <Month>11</Month>
        <Day>14</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </History>
    <abstract locale="en_US">Background: Carpentry workshops present numerous hazards that pose significant risks to worker health and safety. Despite the substantial workforce in micro-scale workshops, these environments have received limited research attention. This study aims to identify and assess the risks associated with hazards in a selected carpentry workshop within a wire industry setting.
Methods: Utilizing the Job Safety Analysis (JSA) method for hazard identification, we delineated the primary tasks performed by carpenters and outlined their respective steps. The AS/NZS 4360:2004 standard was employed to evaluate risk levels.
Results: Our findings revealed that, under the current conditions, 14.3% of identified hazards had a risk priority number of 4, indicating a high risk; 61.9% had a risk priority number of 3, representing intermediate risk; and 23.8% had a risk priority number of 2, signifying low risk. Among the identified hazards, awkward postures accounted for the highest Relative Frequency at 19.04%, followed by falling wood at 14.28%.
Conclusion: Based on the findings, implementing appropriate policies, adequate supervision, and adherence to legal requirements were recommended to enhance safety and health. Ergonomic principles and load-carrying techniques in carpentry practices are crucial for mitigating risks in these workshops.</abstract>
    <web_url>https://ijoh.tums.ac.ir/index.php/ijoh/article/view/649</web_url>
    <pdf_url>https://ijoh.tums.ac.ir/index.php/ijoh/article/download/649/817</pdf_url>
  </Article>
</Articles>
