Articles

Comparison of the Safety Levels of Governmental and Non-Governmental Schools: Study in Yazd City, Iran, 2009

Abstract

The school environment is an environment wherein a student spends one third of his life with teachers and other students. In the present study, the safety levels of governmental and non-governmental schools were studied and compared. In a descriptive cross-sectional study we assessed schools safety using Fire and Life Safety Inspection Checklist presented by the National Fire Prevention Agency (NFPA). After determining the sample size using simple random sampling, 35 high schools of Yazd of which 21 were governmental and 14 were non-governmental schools were selected. Evaluation of the data was done using SPSS V.17.0 software program. The results showed that the highest coefficient of safety in the schools of Yazd was related to air conditioning systems, while the lowest coefficients were related to the electrical and fire safety. Also, the mean electrical and fire safety scores were higher in thenon-governmental schools as compared to the governmental schools (p<0.01). Safety coefficients of all departments were higher in the non-governmental schools as compared to the governmental schools. Considering the results of the study, it is both essential and critical to pay greater attention to the process of reconstruction, repair, maintenance and building of new schools according to international safety standards in order to have a safe school environment that requires the attention of all those responsible in the education department.

Bektas T. Ilkögretim Okullarinda Ögrenci Güvenligi:Büyükçekmece Ilçesi Örnegi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Yildiz Teknik Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Istanbul, 2007.

Barhan A. Ilkögretim Okullarinda Ögrenci Güvenliginin Saglanmasi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, 2007.

Dönmez B.Okul Güvenligi: Sorunu Ve Okul Yöneticisinin Rolü. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Yönetimi 2001; 7(25): 63–74.

Isik H. Okul Güvenligi: Kavramsal Bir Çözümleme. Milli Egitim 2004; 32(164): 154 – 61.

Kaplan LS, Owings WA. Secure School: An Instructional Approach. Principal Leadership 2000; 1(1): 54-59.

Kevin D, Osher D. Safeguarding our children: An action guide. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education and Justice, American Institute for Research, 2000.

Ira P, Sundermann C. Creating Safe Schools: A Comprehensive Approach. Juvenile Justice 2001; (7) 1: 13-20.

Bayrak Ç, Esmahan A. Laboratuar Uygulamalari ve Fen Örgetiminde Güvenlik. Cilt 3. Eskisehir: T.C. Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayinlari, 1999; No: 1079.

Texley J. Safe: Science Facilities. The Science Teacher 2005; 72(6): 39 – 42.

Basaran IE.Egitim Yönetimi Nitelikli Okul. 4. bs. Ankara: Feryal Matbaasi. 2000.

Hammond JS, Hickman C, Ward CG. Burns in school-age children: demographics and burn prevention. J Burn Care Rehabil 1987; 8: 330–2.

Home fire Safety: Fact Sheet http://www.usfa.fema.gov/ public/factsheets/ facts.shtm; accessed year: 2006.

Alaghehbandan R, MacKay Rossignol A, Rastegar Lari A. Pediatric burn injuries in Tehran, Iran. Burns 2001; 27: 115 –8.

John R, Hall J. U.S. Arson Trends and Patterns. In: Quincy, MA. National Fire Protection Association; 2001.

Jay KM, Bartlett RH, Danet R, Allyn PA. Burn epidemiology: a basis for burn prevention. J Trauma 1977; 17: 943–7.

World fire statistics information bulletin http:// www.genevaassociation.org/FIREN, 19-October 2003. pdf; accessed year: 2006.

Harre N, Coveney A. School- based scalds prevention: reaching children and their families. Health Educ Res 2000; 15: 191–202.

Young IM. School health education in Scotland: the health promoting school encouraging parental involvement. Hygie 1992; 11: 40–4.

Franklin GA, Pucci PS, Arbabi S, Brandt MM, Wahl WL, Taheri PA. Decrease d juvenile arson and fire-setting recidivism after implementation of a multidisciplinary prevention program. J Trauma 2002; 53: 260 –6.

Corrarino JE, Walsh PJ, Nadel E. Does teaching scald burn prevention to families of young children make a difference? A pilot study. J Pediatr Nurs 2001; 16: 256–62.

Jordan EA, Duggan AK, Hardy JB. Injuries in children of adolescent mothers: home safety education associated withdecreased injury risk. Pediatrics 1993; 91: 481–7.

Kolko DJ, Kazdin AE. Children’s descriptions of their firesetting incidents: characteristics and relationship to recidivism. J A M Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1994; 33:114–22.

Scholer SJ, Mitchel Jr EF, Ray WA. Predictors of injury mortality in early childhood. Pediatrics 1997; 100:34 2–7.

Mondozzi MA, Harper MA. In search of effective education in burn and fire prevention. J Burn Care Rehabil 2001; 22: 277 – 81.

Kolko DJ, Day BT, Bridge JA, Kazdin AE. Two-year prediction of children’s fire-setting in clinically referred and non referred samples. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines 2001; 42: 371-380.

McLaughlin E, McGuire A. The causes, cost, and prevention of childhood burn injuries. Am J Dis Child 1990; 144: 677–83.

McLaughlin E, Brigham P A. Stop carelessness? No, reduce burn risk. Pediatr Ann 1992; 21: 423 –8.

Files
IssueVol 2 No 1 (2010) QRcode
SectionArticles
 
Keywords
Safety Governmental schools Non-governmental schools Education Iran

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
1.
Halvani GH, Ketabi D. Comparison of the Safety Levels of Governmental and Non-Governmental Schools: Study in Yazd City, Iran, 2009. Int J Occup Hyg. 1;2(1):6-9.