Original Article

Fire and Spillage Risk Assessment Pattern in Scientific Laboratories

Abstract

 Material hazards are the most important risk in scientific laboratories. In risk assessment processing, the potential impact of assessor personal judgment is the most important issue. This study tried to develop a risk assessment pattern based on Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) and Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) logics and empirical data in scientific laboratories. The most important issues were high pressure reservoirs and hardware failure fuel.The other type of data about building plan, evacuation procedure and ability of hazard detection were also collected. Both groups of data were used as input to construct the model. Information integration plays a key role in the performance of fire and spillage risk assessment. For this purpose, a method based on analytical hierarchy process theories was applied to investigate the multi-hierarchy and multi-factor assessment problems. Testing the conceptual model for material risk assessment was performed in the proposed site. The results showed that the Laboratories of Sciences and Research Campus of Azad University were not suitably safe according to the fire and spillage risk assessment model. To reduce the risk probability, all of occupants in the buildings were required to be trained and automatic fire fighting and spillage detection system and adjustable fire exit and emergency stairs should be installed.

Chu GQ, Sun JH, Decision analysis on fire safety design based on evaluating building fire risk to life. Safety Sci 2008; 46(7): 1125-1136.

Liu GZH, Liu T M, Compiling guide of emergency planning to major accident. Labor Prot 2004; 4:11–18.

Kobes M, Helsloot I, Vries B, Post JG, Building safety and human behaviour in fire, a literature review. Fire Safety J 2010; 45(1):1–11.

Wong LT, Cheung TF, Evaluating probable risk of evacuees in institutional buildings. Safety Sci 2006; 44:169–181.

Kalantarnia M, Khan F, Hawboldt K, Dynamic Risk Assessment using Failure Assessment and Bayesian Theory. J Loss Prevent Proc 2009 22(5): 600-606.

Chu GQ, Chen T, Sun ZH, Sun JH, Probabilistic risk assessment for evacuees in building fires. Build Environ 2007; 42(3): 1283-1290.

Nouri J, Mansouri N, Abbaspour M, Karbasi AR, Omidvari M, Designing a developed model for assessing the disaster induced vulnerability value in educational centers. Safety sci 2011; 49: 679–685.

Chen G, Zhang X, Fuzzy-based methodology for performance assessment of emergency planning and its application; J Loss Prevent Proc 2009; 22(2): 125–132.

Grassi A, Gamberini R, Mora C, Rimini B, A fuzzy multi- attribute model for risk evaluation in workplaces. Safety Sci 2009; 47(5): 707-716.

Rehan S, & Tahir H., A fuzzy-based methodology for an aggregative environmental risk assessment: a case study of drilling waste; Environmental Modeling & Software 2005; 20(1): 33–46.

ISO-31010, Risk management – risk assessment technique. ISO, USA, 2009.

Saaty TL, The analytic network process-decision making with dependence and feedback. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 1996.

Saaty TL, The analytic hierarchy process, McGraw-Hill Publishing Co., New York, USA, 1980,

Frantzich H, Report 1016: Uncertainty and Risk Analysis in Fire Safety Engineering. Department of Fire Safety Engineering, Lund University. Lund, Sweden, 1998.

Martinelli A, Cifani G, Cialone G, Corazza L, Petracca L. Petrucci G, Building vulnerability assessment and damage scenarios in Celano (Italy) using a quick survey data-based methodology. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 2008; 28: 875– 889.

Nouri J, Omidvari M, Tehrani SM, Risk Assessment and Crisis Management in Gas Stations. Int J Environ Res 2010; 4(1): 143-152.

Schonwiese CD, Grieser J, Tromel S, Secular change of extreme monthly precipitation in Europe. Theoretical and Applied Climatology 2003; 4: 132–139.

Emanuel K, Increasing destructiveness of tropical cyclones over the past 30 years. Nature 2005; 436: 686–688.

Chow WK, Preliminary views on implementing engineering performance-based fire codes in Hong Kong: what should bedone? Int J Eng Per Based Fire Codes 2002; 4(1): 1–9.

Emanuel K, Increasing destructiveness of tropical cyclones over the past 30 years. Nature 2005; 436: 686–688.

Schonwiese CD, Grieser J, Tromel S, 2003. Secular change of extreme monthly precipitation in Europe. Theoretical and Applied Climatology 2003; 4: 132–139.

Files
IssueVol 6 No 2 (2014) QRcode
SectionOriginal Article(s)
Published2015-10-11
Keywords
Fire Spillage AHP FMEA Scientific laboratories

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
1.
Omidvari M, Mansouri N. Fire and Spillage Risk Assessment Pattern in Scientific Laboratories. Int J Occup Hyg. 2015;6(2):68-74.