Original Article

Assessment of Static and Extremely Low-Frequency Magnetic Fields in the Electric-Powered Trains

Abstract

The engine and power supply of trains in advanced rail transit systems are electric (Alternating current (AC) or Direct current (DC)). Such systems generate magnetic fields in the range of static or extremely low frequencies. This study aimed to assess occupational exposure of train drivers to Static Magnetic Field (SMF) and Extremely Low-Frequency Magnetic Field (ELF-MF). This study was conducted in 2014 on intercity and metro trains in Tehran. Seven trains were randomly selected from intercity and metro lines. Based on the BS EN 50500:2008 method recommendations, magnetic fields were measured by the TES-1394 (ELF-MF meter) and HI-3550 (SMF meter). The exposure of drivers was assessed in accordance with of ACGIH-TLVs. The independent sample t-test, Paired samples t-test, one-way ANOVA (with LSD post hoc), and Mann–Whitney nonparametric test were used for data analysis. Mean (±SD) value of ELF-MF and SMF were measured 1.47 (±1.67) µT and <0.1 mT in the intercity AC trains, 0.45 (±0.53) µT and 0.95 (±0.07) mT in the AC trains, and 0.35 (±0.22) µT and 0.08 (±0.86) mT in the DC trains. In addition, maximum exposure to ELF-MF and SMF were 9 µT in intercity AC trains and 1 mT in DC trains, respectively. In none of the situations, exposure of train drivers to ELF-MF and SMF exceeded the ACGIH-TLVs. This does not mean that these magnetic fields are safe and harmless. Hence, the clinical and/or epidemiological study, along with an ELF-MF and SMF exposure assessment of all railway personals, can be helpful for prevention, identification, and treatment of diseases.

Neutra RR, Glossary of terms used when discussing exposure to electric and magnetic fields. J Epidemiol Commu Health 2005;59(7):546-50.

ACGIH. TLVs and BEIs. kemper meadow drive. American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. Cincinnati, OH 2015;124-6.

Monazzam M R, Jalilian H, Najafi K, Zakerian S A, Zare G, Survey of extremely low frequency magnetic fields exposure of the thermal power plant employees and its possible effect on insomnia severity and sleepiness. Iranian J Radiat Safety Meas 2015;3(1):31-8.

Jalilian H, Monazzam MR, Zakerian SA, Zokaie M, K N, Mental health status among workers exposed to extremely low frequency magnetic fields. Occu Med Quarterly J 2015;7(3):57-68.

Jalilian H, Najafi K, Monazzam MR, Khosravi Y, Jamali J, Occupational exposure of train drivers to static and extremely low frequency magnetic fields in Tehran subway. jundishapur J Health Sci 2017;In press.

Halgamuge MN, Abeyrathne CD, Mendis P, measurment and analysis of electromagnetic field from, trams,trains and hybrid cars. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2010;141(3):255-68.

Contessa GM, Falsaperla R, Brugaletta V, Rossi P, Exposure to magnetic fields of railway engine drivers: a case study in Italy. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2010;142(2-4):160-7.

Dietrich FM, Jacobs WL. Survey and assessment of electric and magnetic field (EMF) public exposure in the transportation environment. 1st ed, March 1999.

ICNIRP Guidelinse. Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric and magnetic fields (1 Hz to 100 kHz). Health Phys 2010;99(6):818-36.

ICNIRP. Guidelines on limits of exposure to static magnetic fields. Health Phys 2009;96(4):504-14.

Chadwick P, Lowes F, Magnetic fields on British trains. Ann Occu Hyg 1998;42(5):331-5.

Alfredsson L, Hammar N, Karlehagen S, Cancer incidence among male railway engine-drivers and conductors in Sweden, 1976–90. Cancer Causes Control 1996;7(3):377-81.

Balli‐Antunes M, Pfluger D, Minder CE, The mortality from malignancies of haematopoietic and lymphatic systems (MHLS) among railway engine drivers. Is exposure to low frequency electromagnetic fields associated with an increase of mortality from MHLS? Environmetrics 1990;1(1):121-30.

Villoresi G, Ptitsyna NG, Kudrin VA, Iucci N, Health Effects among Engine Drivers: Possible Association with Occupational Exposure to Magnetic Fields from DC Electrified Transport. Electr Magnet Bio Med: Springer; 1999. p. 777-80.

Ptitsyna NG, Kopytenko YA, Villoresi G, Pfluger DH, Ismaguilov V, Iucci N, et al, Waveform magnetic field survey in Russian DC and Swiss AC powered trains: a basis for biologically relevant exposure assessment. Bioelectromagnetics 2003;24(8):546-56.

Nordenson I, Mild KH, Jarventaus H, Hirvonen A, Sandstrom M, Wilen J, et al, Chromosomal aberrations in peripheral lymphocytes of train engine drivers. Bioelectromagnetics 2001;22(5):306-15.

Tynes T, Andersen A, Electromagnetic fields and male breast cancer. Lancet 1990;336(8730):1596.

Floderus B, Törnqvist S, Stenlund C, Incidence of selected cancers in Swedish railway workers, 1961–79. Cancer Causes Control 1994;5(2):189-94.

Röösli M, Lörtscher M, Egger M, Pfluger D, Schreier N, Lörtscher E, et al, Leukaemia, brain tumours and exposure to extremely low frequency magnetic fields: cohort study of Swiss railway employees. Occu Environ Med 2007;64(8):553-9.

Santangelo L, Grazia MD, Liotti F, De Maria E, Calabró R, Sannolo N, Magnetic field exposure and arrythmic risk: evaluation in railway drivers. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2005;78(4):337-41.

Roosli M, Egger M, Pfluger D, Minder C, Cardiovascular mortality and exposure to extremely low frequency magnetic fields: a cohort study of Swiss railway workers. Environ Health 2008;7(1), 35.

Monazzam M R, Jalilian H, Najafi K, Zakerian S A, Single-Axis and Three-Axis Probe Magnetic Field Meters in an Occupational Hygiene Study: A Comparative View. Int J Occu Hyg 2015;7(4):166-71.

European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization (CENELEC). Measurement procedures of magnetic field levels generated by electronic and electrical apparatus in the railway environment with respect to human exposure (standard no. EN 50500: 2008). Brussels, Belgium: CENELEC; 2008.

Nakagava M, Koana T. Electricity and magnetism in biology and medicine. In: Blank, M., Ed. San Francisco: Press Inc1993

Stavroulakis P. Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields: Mechanisms, Modeling, Biological Effects, Therapeutic Effects, International Standards, Exposure Criteria. Stavroulakis ed. Springer; 2003.

Ptitsyna N, Ponzetto A, editors. Magnetic fields encountered in electric transport: Rail systems, trolleybus and cars. Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC EUROPE), 2012 International Symposium on; 2012 17-21 Sept. 2012.

Barsam T, Monazzam MR, Haghdoost AA, Ghotbi MR, Dehghan SF, Effect of extremely low frequency electromagnetic field exposure on sleep quality in high voltage substations. Iranian J Environ Health Sci Eng 2012;9(1):15.

Mee T, Whatmough P, Broad L, Dunn C, Maslanyj M, Allen S, et al, Occupational exposure of UK adults to extremely low frequency magnetic fields. Occu Environ Med. 2009;66(9):619-27.

Monazzam MR, Jalilian H, Najafi K, S.A. Z, Emkani M, Hadadi H, Environmental evaluation and employee’s exposure of a thermal power plant with extremely low frequency magnetic fields. Iran Occu Health J 2015;12(3):65-75.

Yamaguchi-Sekino S, Nakai T, Imai S, Izawa S, Okuno T, Occupational exposure levels of static magnetic field during routine MRI examination in 3 T MR system. Bioelectromagnetics 2014, 35.1: 70-75.

McRobbie DW, Occupational exposure in MRI. British J Radiology 2012;85(1012):293-312.

Minder CE, Pfluger DH, Leukemia, brain tumors, and exposure to extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields in Swiss railway employees. Am J Epidemiol 2001;153(9):825-35.

Floderus B, Tornqvist S, Stenlund C, Incidence of selected cancers in Swedish railway workers, 1961-79. Cancer Causes Control 1994;5(2):189-94.

Files
IssueVol 9 No 2 (2017) QRcode
SectionOriginal Article(s)
Published2017-06-24
Keywords
Train drivers’ exposure ELF and static magnetic field Tehran subway

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
1.
JALILIAN H, NAJAFI K, MONAZZAM MR, KHOSRAVI Y, ZAMANIAN Z. Assessment of Static and Extremely Low-Frequency Magnetic Fields in the Electric-Powered Trains. Int J Occup Hyg. 2017;9(2):105-112.