Articles

Fuzzy Logic Method for Assessment of Noise Exposure Risk in an Industrial Workplace

Abstract

At present, conventional methods of noise exposure assessment utilize in industrial workplaces. In the classical area assessment method, noise exposure assessment depends on sound pressure level measurement results that expressed numerically and indicated  harmful areas. This paper proposes an exposure assessment method of occupational noise based on Fuzzy sets. The noise assessment by Fuzzy logic method involves the primary investigation of the workplace, determined inputs and output variables, Fuzzification, Fuzzy rules, Fuzzy inference method and Defuzzification. This assessment method considered a function consists of Noise level, the number of exposed workers, exposure duration and noise reverberation time. Suggested method makes possible to evaluate unconsidered cases in order to assess of noise exposure risk. Fuzzy logic assessment results are more useful and flexible for analysis than conventional assessment. Fuzzy logic provides the opportunity to obtain risk model of noise exposure based on noise parameters, dimension of workplace and human perceptions.

Wright SE, Atmoko H. Active control of environmental noise, V: the effect of environmental change on the stability of free field sound canceling system. J of Sound and Vibration 2001; 28: 107-122.

Golmohammadi R, Atari SQ, Arefian S et al. A rapid method for estimating of noise exposure in work-places. J Research Health Sciences (JRHS) 2008; 8(2): 21-27.

Aluclu I, Dalgic A, Toprak ZF. A Fuzzy logic-based model for noise control at industrial workplaces. Applied Ergonomics 2008; 39: 368–378.

Rachiotis G, Alexopoulos C, Drivas S. Occupational exposure to noise and hearing function among electro production workers. Auris Nasus Larynx 2006; 33: 381–385.

Bell Lewis H, Bell D H. Industrial Noise Control, New York, Marcel Dekkel, 1994.

Gokhan G, Tahir CA, Mehmet T et al. Assessment of student performance in laboratory applications using Fuzzy logic. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 2010; 2: 902–909.

Zaheeruddin V K J. An expert system for predicting the effects of speech interference due to noise pollution on humans using Fuzzy approach. Expert Systems with Applications 2007; 8:104.

Benetto E, Dujet C, Rousseaux P. Fuzzy-Sets Approach to Noise Impact Assessment. Fuzzy Sets, Uncertainties in LCA (Subject Editor: Andreas Ciroth) 2006; 11 (4): 222 – 228.

Kosko B. Fuzzy thinking: the new science of Fuzzy logic. Reason Papers, New York: Hyperion 1993; 183-187.

Zadeh LA. Fuzzy Sets. Information and Control. University of California, California 1965; 8: 338-353.

Zadeh LA. This Week’s Citation Classic. Fuzzy sets Inform. Contr. 8,338-53, 1965 University of California 1980; 47: 26.

Sanchez E. Truth-qualification and Fuzzy relations in natural languages application to medical diagnosis. Fuzzy Sets and Systems1996; 84: 155-167.

Kasabov N K. Foundations of Neural Networks, Fuzzy Systems and knowledge engineering. The MIT Press, Cambridge, England, Second printing, 1998.

Zaheeruddin VK J. A Fuzzy expert system for noise-induced sleep disturbance. Expert Systems with Applications 2006; 30: 761–771.

Mehmet RA, Mehmet FT, Taskin H. Selecting the optimal shift numbers using Fuzzy control model: a paint factory’s facility application. J Intell Manuf 2009; 20: 267–272.

Trobec Lah T, Zupanc ic B, Peternelj J, Krainer A. Daylight illuminance control with Fuzzy logic. Solar Energy 2006; 80: 307–321.

Peng W, Mayorga R V. Assessing traffic noise impact based on probabilistic and Fuzzy approaches under uncertainty. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 2008; 22:541–550.

Files
IssueVol 3 No 2 (2011) QRcode
SectionArticles
 
Keywords
Noise exposure Fuzzy logic Assessment method Industrial workplace

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
1.
Golmohammadi R, Eshaghi M, Reyahi Khoram M. Fuzzy Logic Method for Assessment of Noise Exposure Risk in an Industrial Workplace. Int J Occup Hyg. 1;3(2):49-55.