Survey of the Smartphones Usability Score and the Level of Satisfaction among Elderly Users
Smartphones are one of the latest technologies which have a profound impact on users’ daily life. This technology was adapted to meet the expectations of users in different age’s groups, but elderly users may encounter some difficulty while using these devices. The current study was aimed to evaluate the usability of smartphones for elderly users, and assess their level of satisfaction with these devices. The number of 30 elderly subjects with previous experience of using a smartphone were invited to take part in the study. Participants were asked to unlock the phone, enter their contact list and call a specific person, add a new number to their contact list and save it, compose a text message and send it, set an alarm, and locate the nearest bank with the help of a smartphone map application. Demographic questionnaires and System Usability Scale (SUS) were filled out by the subjects and a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) was used to assess user’s satisfaction. The average time spent on completing different tasks, namely unlocking, finding a specific contact, adding a new number, texting, setting an alarm, and using a map were: 45.6, 79.4, 119.5, 113.5, 54, and 48 seconds ,respectively. The mean score for SUS and satisfaction were 59.13 and 62.5, respectively, which were acceptable for these two factors. Age is an important factor in the usability of this technology, with older people stating lower levels of usability. Since the results of the study showed that smartphones need to become more usable for this group of users, it can be said that age of consumers is an important factor that should be taken into account when designing new technologies.
Page T. Touchscreen mobile devices and older adults: a usability study. Int J Hum Factors Ergon [Internet]. 2014;3(1):65. Available from: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=62550
Keränen NS, Kangas M, Immonen M, Similä H. Use of Information and Communication Technologies Among Older People With and Without Frailty : A Population-Based Survey Corresponding Author : 2017;19:1–11.
Bruder C, Blessing L, Wandke H. Adaptive training interfaces for less-experienced, elderly users of electronic devices. Behav Inf Technol. 2014 Jan 2;33(1):4–15.
TAGHIPOUR DARZI M, HOSSEINI SEYED R, KIA K, ABBASPOUR M, GHADIMI R. PREVALENCE OF MUSCULOSKELETAL PAIN AND IT’S CORRELATION TO FUNCTIONAL DISABILITY IN ELDERLY [Internet]. Vol. 8. KNOWLEDGE AND HEALTH; 2013 [cited 2017 Dec 6]. p. 76–82. Available from: http://www.sid.ir/En/Journal/ViewPaper.aspx?ID=340852
Zhou J, Rau P-LP, Salvendy G. Older adults’ use of smart phones: an investigation of the factors influencing the acceptance of new functions. Behav Inf Technol [Internet]. 2014;33(6):552–60. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0144929X.2013.780637
Navabi N, Ghaffari F, Jannat-Alipoor Z. Older adults’ attitudes and barriers toward the use of mobile phones. Clin Interv Aging [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2017 Dec 3];11:1371–8. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27757025
Ropponen J-O. Usability of mobile devices and applications for elderly users. 2016;
Melenhorst A-S, Rogers WA, Caylor EC. The Use of Communication Technologies by Older Adults: Exploring the Benefits from the User’s Perspective. Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet [Internet]. 2001;45(3):221–5. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/154193120104500305
Sonderegger A, Schmutz S, Sauer J. The influence of age in usability testing. Appl Ergon. 2016;52.
Darroch I, Goodman J, Brewster S, Gray P. The effect of age and font size on reading text on handheld computers . Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3585 : pp . 253-266 . The Effect of Age and Font Size on Reading Text on Handheld Computers. Lect Notes Comput Sci. 2005;253–66.
Tsai T-H, Tseng KC, Chang Y-S. Testing the usability of smartphone surface gestures on different sizes of smartphones by different age groups of users. Comput Human Behav [Internet]. 2017;75:103–16. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.05.013
Kurniawan S. Older people and mobile phones: A multi-method investigation. Int J Hum Comput Stud. 2008;66(12):889–901.
Kurniawan S, Mahmud M, Nugroho Y. A study of the use of mobile phones by older persons. CHI ’06 Ext Abstr Hum factors Comput Syst - CHI EA ’06 [Internet]. 2006;989–94. Available from: http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=1125451.1125641%5Cnhttp://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=1125451.1125641
van Biljon J, Renaud K. Validating Mobile Phone Design Guidelines. Proc Annu Conf South African Inst Comput Sci Inf Technol - SAICSIT ’16 [Internet]. 2016;1–10. Available from: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=2987491.2987492
Page T. Feature creep and usability in consumer electronic product design. Int J Prod Dev [Internet]. 2009;9(4):406. Available from: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=27474
Bevan N, Kirakowski J, Maissel J. What is Usability? 1991 [cited 2017 Dec 6]; Available from: http://www.nigelbevan.com/papers/whatis92.pdf
Pathologist S. This document : More Project information and further documents : SUS - A quick and dirty usability scale. 1986;1–8.
Chiu CC, Vicente KJ, Buffo-Sequeira I, Hamilton RM, McCrindle BW. Usability assessment of pacemaker programmers. PACE - Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2004;27(10):1388–98.
Anderson J, Wagner J, Bessesen M, C.Williams L. Usability Testing in the Hospital. Hum Factors Ergon Manuf Serv Ind. 2006;16(1):61–81.
Barnard Y, Bradley MD, Hodgson F, Lloyd AD. Learning to use new technologies by older adults: Perceived difficulties, experimentation behaviour and usability. Comput Human Behav [Internet]. 2013 Jul [cited 2017 Aug 7];29(4):1715–24. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0747563213000721
|Issue||Vol 11 No 1 (2019)|
|Usability Aging Smartphone Performance|
|Rights and permissions|
|This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.|