Evaluation of Compressive and Shear Forces Exerted on the Lower Back in Manual Load Handling Tasks among Young Workers of Selected Block Maker Using 3DSSPP
Due to the negative influence of manual load handling on the lower back, it leads to low back disorders and high mechanical loads. The present study was aimed to investigate forces exerted on the lower back during manual handling in young workers in selected block-making workshops. This descriptive, cross-sectional study was carried out on 40 young workers with an average age of 31 years old in several block-making industries in 2020. 3DSSPP Software was used for biomechanical analysis of the forces exerted on the lower back. The prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders was assessed using the Standard Cornell Questionnaires. Spearman, Friedman, and ANOVA correlation tests via SPSS software version19 were used to determine the relationship between demographic variables, the prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders, the relationship between the prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders, the amount of compressive, and shear forces on workers' backs. The results showed that the mean compressive and shear forces exerted to the lumbosacral joint (L5/S1) were 3194.85 ± 1064.326 and 473.17 ± 89.451 N, the intervertebral disc (L4/L5) were 3924.78 ±4344.87 and 383.18 ± 154.554. The findings also indicated that the highest prevalence of pain was related to the lower back 45% and right knee 30%. There was a significant relationship between the mean score of musculoskeletal disorders obtained from the Cornell questionnaire with age, work experience, and weight and body mass (0.001> P). The shear forces exerted to the lower back were higher than the permissible levels by 30% to 37% of respondents, and on average 42.5% of them experienced compressive forces. Thus, it can cause a lot of injuries to the back if lasts for a long time. The results showed that manual load handling was dangerous for this group's ages. Consequently, people may suffer serious injuries and disorders particularly lower back disorders.
2. Kim EA, Kang SK. Historical review of the List of Occupational Diseases recommended by the International Labour organization (ILO). Annals of Occup Environ Med. 2013; 25(1):14.
3. Asadi N, Choobineh A, Keshavarzi S, Daneshmandi H. Estimation of forces exerted on the lower back in manual load lifting using 3DSSPP software. Iranian J Ergon. 2015; 2(4): 25-31.
4. Attwood D, Baybutt P, Devlin C, Fluharty W, Hughes G, Isaacson D, Joyner P, Lee E, Lorenzo D, Morrison L, Ormsby B . Human factors methods for improving performance in the process industries. Wiley Online Library, 2007, NW, USA.
5. Marras WS, Karwowski W. Fundamentals and assessment tools for occupational ergonomics. 1st ed. Crc Press, Boca Raton, USA, 2006.
6. Morken T, Riise T, Moen B, Signe HV Hauge, Holien S, Langedrag A, Pedersen S, Inger Lise L Saue, Seljebø MG, Thoppil V. Low back pain and widespread pain predict sickness absence among industrial workers, BMC Muscu Disor. 2003; 4(1): 1-8.
7. Louw QA, Morris LD, Grimmer-Somers K. The prevalence of low back pain in Africa: a systematic review. BMC Muscu Disor. 2007; 8(1): 1-14.
8. Mousavi SJ,Akbari ME, Mehdian H, Mobini B, Montazei A, Akbarnia B, Parnianpour M. Low back pain in Iran: a growing need to adapt and implement evidence-based practice in developing countries, Spine. 2011; 36(10): 638-646.
9. Sato T, Ito T, Hirano T, Morita O, Kikuchi R, Endo N, Tanabe N. Low back pain in childhood and adolescence: a cross-sectional study in Niigata City. European Spine J. 2008;17(11): 1441-1447.
10. Szpalski M, Gunzburg R, Balagué F, Nordin M, Melot C. A 2-year prospective longitudinal study on low back pain in primary school children. European Spine J. 2002; 11(5): 459-464.
11. Bevan S. Economic impact of musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) on work in Europe. Best
Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology. 2015; 29(3): 356-373.
12. Steele E, Bialocerkowski A, Grimmer K. The postural effects of load carriage on young people–a systematic review. BMC Muscu Disor. 2003; 4(1): 12.
13. Torkaman J, Motamedzadeh M, Attari SG, Roshanaei G. Assessment of compressive force on back of hamadan building construction workers during manual load handling by utah method in 2015: a short report. J Rafsanjan Uni Medi Sci. 2017; 16(8): 797-804.
14. Merryweather AS, Loertscher MC, Bloswick DS. A revised back compressive force estimation model for ergonomic evaluation of lifting tasks. Work. 2009; 34(3): 263-272.
15. Abadi A.SS, Saraji GN, Mazloumi A, ZERAATI H, Hadian MR, Jafari AH. Changes in Back Compressive Force When Measuring Maximum Acceptable Weight of Lift in Iranian Male Students. Iranian J Pub Health. 2016; 45(9): 1199.
16. Abedi M, Ghanbary A, Habibi E, Palyzban F, Ghasemi H, Hasani AA. Back Compressive Force (BCF) assessment using UTAH method in manual handling tasks among workers of a chemical manufacturing company. J Occup Health Epide. 2018; 7(4): 222-226.
17. Mirmohammadi S, Gholizadeh, Abbasabad A, Mousavinasab S, Hosseini Nejad SE, Alizadeh H. Forces Loaded on the Back of Manual Material Handling Tasks' Workers of Food Industries in Malard Using" 3D Static Strength Prediction Program. Occup Hygn Health Promo J. 2018; 2(3): 168-177.
18. Allahyari T, Hedayati S, Khalkhali H, Ghaderi F. A comparative survey on forces exerted to low back in patient manual handling. Iranian J Ergon. 2014; 2(2): 1-8.
19. Mirmohammadi ST, Gholizadeh Abbasabad A, Mousavinasab SN, Hosseininejad SE, Alizadeh H. Ergonomic Evaluation of the Manual Material Handling Tasks in the Food Industries of Malard County Using the 3D" Static Strength Prediction Program" and the Key Indicator Method (KIM). J Health Dev. 2019; 8(2): 175-186.
20. Antonini JM, Anderson SE. Occupational Health and Industrial Hygiene. Environ Health Insights. 2014; 8(1): 97-98. Available from: Occupational Health and Industrial Hygiene (nih.gov)
21. Afifehzadeh-Kashani H, Choobineh A, Bakand S, Gohari M, Abbastabar H, Moshtaghi P. Validity and reliability of farsi version of Cornell Musculoskeletal Discomfort Questionnaire (CMDQ). Iran Occup Health J. 2011; 7(4): 69-75.
22. Dormohammadi A, Motamedzade M, Zarei E, Asghari M, Musavi S. Comparative assessment of manual material handling using the two methods of NIOSH lifting equation in a tile manufacturing company MAC and revised. Iran Occup Health J. 2013; 10(5): 71-81.
23. Das D, Kumar A, Sharma M. A systematic review of work-related musculoskeletal disorders among handicraft workers. Intl J Occup Saf Ergon. 2018; 55-70.
24. Eskandari D, Norizadeh N, Saadati H, Mohammadpour S, Gholami A. The prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders and occupational risk factors in Kashan SAIPA automobile industry workers by key indicator method (KIM). JOHS, 2012; 2(1): 27-36.
25. Choobineh A, Tabatabaei SH, Mokhtarzadeh A, Salehi M. Musculoskeletal problems among workers of an Iranian rubber factory. J Occup. Health. 2007; 49(5): 418-423.
26. Gallagher S, Heberger JR. The effects of operator position, pallet orientation, and palletizing condition on low back loads in manual bag palletizing operations. Intl J Indus Ergn. 2015; 47: 84-92.
27. Kudo N, Yamada Y, Ito D. Age-related injury risk curves for the lumbar spine for use in low-back-pain prevention in manual handling tasks. Robomech J. 2019; 6(1): 1-10.
28. Mazloumi A, Kheikhmoghadam A, Tabatabaei S, Mokhtarinia H. Ergonomic evaluation of causes of low back pain using digital human modeling(DHM) in one of the Automotive industries. J Health Saf at Work. 2011; 1(1): 32- 38.
29. Mohammadi H, Motamedzade M, Faghih MA, Bayat H, Habibi Mohraz M, Musavi S. Manual material handling assessment by snook tables in Hamadan casting workshops. Iran Occup Health. 2013; 10(1): 60-69.
30. Hess JA, Kincl L, Amasay T, Wolfe P. Ergonomic evaluation of masons laying concrete masonry units and autoclaved aerated concrete. Appl Ergon. 2010; 41(3): 477-483.
|Issue||Vol 13 No 1 (2021)|
|Manual load handling Cornell questionnaire (CMDQ) Low back pain 3DSSPP software Block maker industries Compressive and shear forces|
|Rights and permissions|
|This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.|