Descriptive Study of Safety and Health Training Content in Iran’s Universities and Higher Education Institutes
Abstract
The root cause of many workplace incidents is the lack of knowledge on occupational safety and health principles. Despite the safety and health authorities in organizations, safety and health is the general responsibility of all other experts working in an organization. Experts and managers are expected to think, decide and work safely in workplaces. However, we don’t have enough information about the level of safety and health-related education when they were in universities. In addition, there is not too much reliable published reports on the academic teaching of safety and health courses and syllabus in higher education in Iran. Therefore, the current study was aimed to provide a general view of the status of occupational safety and health teaching subjects in different academic disciplines (excluding specialized fields in occupational safety and health) in the Iranian higher educational system. Firstly, the latest edition of the entire program (curricula) of all academic disciplines held in Iranian universities was downloaded. Secondly, the required information, including discipline title, program’s degree, number of required (core) and elective (non-core) courses, and program’s date of approval, were recorded in an Excel sheet. Every course’s title and syllabus were then studied to find out any safety and health-related topics. Finally, data were analyzed and reported. 251 academic disciplines in the Ministry of Health and Medical Education (MOHME) and 771 disciplines in the Ministry of Science, Research and Technology (MSRT) were investigated. Most of the curriculums have been revised by both ministries since 2011. Results showed that 20 percent of the MOHME disciplines and 10.4 percent of MSRT disciplines were included in the occupational safety and health courses. The number of courses with health and safety content (syllabus outline) in the MOHME and the MSRT were 168 and 173. Most health and safety courses presented in the MOHME academic majors were in the basic medical sciences category of disciplines. A majority of MSRT covered academic safety and health courses and topics were presented in the engineering category of disciplines. Presenting lessons with health and safety content at the MOHME was more practical than that of the MSRT. The quality and quantity of teaching on safety and health topic were not at satisfactory levels. Revising the course syllabus of the academic disciplines and adding theoretical and practical courses related to each field's specific health and safety curriculum can make a significant contribution in improving the general knowledge of the safety and health of the university graduates. In turn, it improves future workplace safety and health conditions, managers’ insights and decision-makers on the importance of safety and health at work. It protects the people's life and the property of the organization.
2. MSRT. The Ministry of Science, Research and Technology: universities and higher education institutes. Available from: https://www.msrt.ir.
3. ISNA. Iranian Universities According to Statistics. Available from: https://www.isna.ir/news/ 97030804268/.
4. HDR. Human Development Report. Available from: http://hdr.undp.org/en/reports/global/hdr.
5. Arghami S, Pouyakian M. Safety history and organization. In: Jahangiri M, Choobineh AR. Principles of safety management and engineering. 1st edn. Ed by Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran, 2019.
6. Atrkar Roshan S, Alizadeh SS. Estimate of economic costs of accidents at work in Iran: A case study of occupational accidents in 2012. Iran Occup Health. 2015; 12(1). [In Persian].
7. MCLSW. Labor Law. Available from: https://www.mcls.gov.ir/fa/lawlist/kar.
8. SBMU. The evolution of occupational health engineering. Available from: http://ohs.sbmu.ac. ir/index.jsp? Paged=32065&p=1.
9. Perrin L, Gabas N, Corriou J-P, Laurent A. Promoting safety teaching: An essential requirement for the chemical engineering education in the French universities. J Loss Prev Process Indust. 2018; 54:190-195.
10. Karapantsios T, Boutskou E, Touliopoulou E, Mavros P. Evaluation of chemical laboratory safety based on student comprehension of chemicals labelling. Educ Chem Eng. 2008; 3(1):e66-e73.
11. Fayazi A, Pouyakian M, Jafari MJ, Khodakarim S. A Survey among Three Iranian Occupational Groups: General Knowledge of Chemical Safety and Familiarity with GHS and Outdated Labeling
Systems. ACS Chem Health Saf. 2020; 27(1):43-51.
12. Sigmann S. Chemical safety education for the 21st century—fostering safety information competency in chemists. J Chem Health Saf. 2018; 25(3):17-29.
13. Reinhold K, Siirak V, Tint P. The development of higher education in occupational health and safety in Estonia and selected EU countries. Procedia-Social Beha Sci. 2014; 143:52-56.
14. Copsey S, Debruyne M, Eeckelaert L, Malmelin J, Salminen S, Buffet M, Backé EM, Brück C, Krauss-Hoffmann P, Wolf T. Mainstreaming occupational safety and health into university education. Publications Office of the European Union; 2010.
15. Macuzic I, Giagloglou E, Djapan M, Todorovic P, Jeremic B. Occupational safety and health education under the lifelong learning framework in Serbia. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2016; 22(4):514-522.
16. Mulcahy MB. Welcome to ACS Chemical Health & Safety. ACS Chem Health Saf. 2020; 27(1):1-2.
17. Louvar JF, Hendershot DC. SACHE: 17 years of promoting teaching of safety to chemical engineering students. Chem Health Saf. 2003; 10(5):8-10.
18. Hill Jr RH, Nelson DA. Strengthening safety education of chemistry undergraduates. Chem Health Saf. 2005; 12(6):19-23.
19. Kletz TA. Should undergraduates be instructed in loss prevention? Plant/Oper Prog. 1988; 7(2):95-98.
20. Meyer T. Towards the implementation of a safety education program in a teaching and research institution. Educ Chem Eng. 2017; 18:2-10.
21. Langerman N. Management of change for laboratories and pilot plants. Org Process Res Dev. 2008; 12(6):1305-1306.
22. Marendaz J-L, Suard J-C, Meyer T. A systematic tool for Assessment and Classification of Hazards in Laboratories (ACHiL). Saf Sci. 2013; 53:168-176.
23. ISNA. Terrible explosion in Tarbiat Modares University laboratory, death of a doctoral student. Available from: https: //www.isna.ir/news/8510-14509/.
24. ISNA. Explosion in the chemical laboratory of Bu Ali Sina University. Available from: https: //www.isna.ir/news/91050100529/.
25. ANA. Injury of 20 Isfahani students due to chemical explosion in school laboratory. Available from: https://ana.ir/fa/news/41/23309 5/.
26. ISNA. Six Fasa University students injured in laboratory. Available from: https://www.isna.ir /news/96021710748/.
27. ISNA. The cause of the accident was a gas leak in the laboratory building / the production process of Hormozgan Steel Company is not a problem. Available from: https://www.isna.ir/ news/9701020 0198/.
28. Hill Jr RH. Getting safety into the chemistry curriculum. Chem Health Saf. 2003; 10(2):7-9.
29. Huston EM, Milligan JA, Powell JR, Smith AM, Neal D, Keith M, Duval KM, DiNardo MA, Stoddard C, Bell PA, Berning AW, Wipf P, Bandik GC. Development of an Undergraduate Course in Chemical Laboratory Safety through an Academic/Industrial Collaboration. J Chem Edu. 2018; 95(4):577-583.
30. Wu T-C. The roles and functions of safety professionals in Taiwan: Comparing the perceptions of safety professionals and safety educators. J Safety Res. 2011; 42(5):399-407.
31. Crockett JM. Laboratory safety for undergraduates. J Chem Health Saf. 2011; 18(4):16-25.
Files | ||
Issue | Vol 13 No 2 (2021) | |
Section | Original Article(s) | |
Published | 2021-06-30 | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.18502/ijoh.v13i2.8371 | |
Keywords | ||
Safety and Health Discipline Syllabus Higher Education Course Iran |
Rights and permissions | |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |