Evaluation of Health, Safety and Environment (HSE) Culture
Studies have determined that the application of technical safety measures is not adequate to protect human, economic and environmental assets in industries. Therefore, promoting Health, Safety and Environment (HSE culture), as an alternative approach, is of great importance. The aim of this study was to evaluate and manage HSE culture among employees of an industrial sector in Iran. This descriptiveanalytic research was carried out during the years 2009 and 2010. The statistical population included ten subsidiaries of the industry. To gather the required data, an HSE culture questionnaire was developed. SPSS software was also applied to analyze the data gathered. Data analysis determined that the mean of HSE culture scores was 262.7. Considering the borderline between the negative and positive HSE culture (279), it is inferred that 79.4% of personnel culture scores was negative. Finally, the study concluded that to improve safety culture in an organization, not only psychological and personal factors but also organizational and environmental factors should thoroughly be investigated. In this way, the actual problems would be identified, appropriate problem-solving methodologies be implemented and, ultimately incidents rate be reduced.
Mariscal MA,Herrero SG,Otero AT. Assessing safety culture in the Spanish nuclear industry through the use of working groups.Safety Sci 2012;50: 1237– 246.
Cooper MD. Towards a model of safety culture. Safety Sci 2000;36: 111-136.
Reiman T,Oedewald P.Measuring maintenance culture and maintenance core task with CULTURE questionnaire –a case study in the power industry.Safety Sci 2004; 42: 859–889.
Chinda T, Mohamed S. Structural equation model of construction safety culture. Eng Construct Architect Manag 2008; 15: 114–131.
Frank WL. Process safety culture in the CCPS risk based process safety model. Process Saf Prog 2007; 26: 203–208.
Coyle IR, Sleeman SD, Adams N. Safety climate. J Saf Res 1995; 26 (4): 247–254.
Guldenmund FW. The nature of safety culture: a review of theory and research. Safety Sci 2000; 34: 215–257.
Lee TR, Harrison K. Assessing safety culture in nuclear power stations. Safety Sci 2000; 34: 61–97.
Lee TR. Assessment of safety culture at a nuclear reprocessing plant. Work and Stress 1998: 12: 217–237.
Glendon AI, Stanton NA. Perspectives on safety culture. Safety Sci 2000; 34: 193–214.
Filn R, Mearns K, O’Connor P, Bryden R. Measuring safety climate: identifying the common feature. Safety Sci 2000; 34: 177–193.
Santos-Reyes J, Beard AL. Assessing safety management systems. J Loss Prev Process Ind 2002; 15: 77–95.
DeJoy D M, Schaffer BS,Wilson MG,VandenbergRJ, Butts MM. Creating safer workplaces: Assessing the determinants and role of safety climate. J Saf Res 2004; 35, 81−90.
Griffin MA, Neal A. Perceptions of safety at work: a framework for linking safety climate to safety performance, knowledge and motivation. J Occup Health Psychol 2000; 5 (3): 347–358.
Richter A, Koch C. Integration, differentiation and ambiguity in safety cultures. Safety Sci 2004; 42: 703–722.
Gherardi S, Nicolini D, Odella F. What do you mean by safety? Conflicting perspectives on accident causation and safety management in a construction firm. J Conting Crisis Manag
; 6: 202–213.
Christian K. Trends in accidents, disasters and risk sources in Europe. J Loss Prev Process Ind 1999; 12: 7-17.
Grote G, Kunzler C. Diagnosis of safety culture in safety management audits. Safety Sci 2000; 34 (1–3): 131–150.
Azadeh A, Nouri J, Mohammad Fam I. The impacts of total system design factors on human performance in power plants.Am J Appl Sci 2005; 9:1301-4.
Dianne P, Matthew L, Patrick H. The use of questionnaires in safety culture research – an evaluation. Safety Sci 2007; 45: 723- 743.
Rundmo T. Safety climate, attitudes and risk perception in Norsk Hydro. Safety Sci 2000; 34: 47–59.
Lars H. Relationships between accident investigations, risk analysis, and safety management. J Hazard Mater 2004; 111: 13-19.
Donald I, Young S. Managing safety: an Attitudinal-based approach to improving safety in organizations. Leadersh Manage Eng 1996; 17: 13−20.
Vecchio-Sadus A M, Griffiths S. Marketing strategies for enhancing safety culture. Safety Sci 2004; 42: 601−619.
Frank WL. Evaluating a safety culture campaign: Some lessons from a Norwegian case. Safety Sci 2010; 48: 651-659.
Hudson, P. Implementing a safety culture in a major multinational. Safety Sci 2007; 45: 697–722.
Suman Ro. Safety culture and accident analysis-A sociomanagement approach based on organizational safety social capital.J Hazard Mater 2007; 142: 730-40.
Zohar D. The effects of leadership dimensions, safety climate, and assigned priorities on minor injuries in work groups. JOrgan Behav 2002; 23: 75–92.
Hale AR. Safety rules O.K? Possibilities and limitations in behavioral safety strategies. Safety Sci 1990; 12: 3–20.
Brewer HD, Canasy KS. Probabilistic safety assessment support for the maintenance rule at Duke Power Company. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 1999; 36: 243–249.
Baram M, Schoebel M. Editorial – safety culture and behavioral change at the workplace. Safety Sci 2007; 45: 631–636.
Camino Lopez MA, Ritzel DO, Fontaneda I, Gonzalez OJ. Construction industry accidents in Spain. J Saf Res 2008; 39:497– 507.
Vredenburgh AG. Organizational safety: which management practices are most effective in reducing employee injury rates? JSaf Res 2002; 33: 259–276.
Zohar D. The effects of leadership dimensions, safety climate,and assigned priorities on minor injuries in work groups. J Organ Behav 2002; 23: 75–92.
|Issue||Vol 5 No 1 (2013)|
|Safety Culture Management Environment Health|
|Rights and permissions|
|This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.|