Mapping the Evolution of Risk-Based Maintenance Research: A Bibliometric Perspective
,
Abstract
Background: Risk-based maintenance (RBM) establishes a framework for optimizing maintenance strategies and decision-making processes. This review study presents a bibliometric analysis of peer-reviewed research in risk-based maintenance literature over recent decades. The main objective is to identify the most relevant research and the newest trends in the field, according to the information found in databases.
Methods: This study uses bibliometric methods to examine 486 publications in the Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus databases up to 21 July 2024. With the help of VOSviewer software, bibliographic connections between these publications are visualized.
Results: The analysis reveals a significant increase in publications on this topic in the past decade, with China, the United States, the United Kingdom, Japan, and Germany being the leading contributors. A large portion of the relevant documents comes from articles in the Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, with conferences being the most popular medium for sharing industry knowledge. Furthermore, the co-citation network of references reveals seven clusters: Risk Assessment, Risk-Based Maintenance, Decision Making, Inspection, Reliability and Failure Analysis, Maintenance Strategies, and Predictive Maintenance. Each cluster emphasizes strategic planning and the role of risk management in optimizing maintenance processes. Four visual outputs generated by VOSviewer—network map, overlay map, density map, and co-citation network—illustrate the relationships between scholarly articles and the interconnectedness of influential works.
Conclusion: These visualizations highlight the multifaceted nature of RBM research and provide a framework for future investigations aimed at enhancing maintenance strategies across various industries. This analysis serves as a foundational resource for researchers and practitioners seeking to navigate the landscape of RBM, guiding future research directions and practical applications.
2. Leoni L, De Carlo F, Paltrinieri N, Sgarbossa F, BahooToroody A. On risk-based maintenance: a comprehensive review of three approaches to track the impact of consequence modelling for predicting maintenance actions. J Loss Prev Process Ind. 2021;72:104555.
3. Grimstad J, Ruppert T, Abonyi J, Morozov A. Preventive risk-based maintenance scheduling using discrete-time Markov chain models. 2023.
4. Chen L, Toyoda J, editors. Maintenance scheduling based on two level hierarchical structure to equalize incremental risk. In: Proc Power Ind Comput Appl Conf. IEEE; 1989.
5. Khan FI, Haddara MM. Risk-based maintenance (RBM): a quantitative approach for maintenance/inspection scheduling and planning. J Loss Prev Process Ind. 2003;16(6):561–73.
6. Leoni L, De Carlo F, Sgarbossa F, Paltrinieri N. Comparison of risk-based maintenance approaches applied to a natural gas regulating and metering station. 2020.
7. Kaewunruen S, Osman MH, Cheng EWH. Risk-based maintenance planning for rail fastening systems. ASCE-ASME J Risk Uncertain Eng Syst Part A Civ Eng. 2019;5(3):04019007.
8. Yazdi M, Nedjati A, Abbassi R. Fuzzy dynamic risk-based maintenance investment optimization for offshore process facilities. J Loss Prev Process Ind. 2019;57:194–207.
9. Tusar MIH, Sarker BR. Maintenance cost minimization models for offshore wind farms: a systematic and critical review. Int J Energy Res. 2022;46(4):3739–65.
10. Iqbal H, Tesfamariam S, Haider H, Sadiq R. Inspection and maintenance of oil & gas pipelines: a review of policies. Struct Infrastruct Eng. 2017;13(6):794–815.
11. Alsharif AH, Salleh N, Baharun R. Bibliometric analysis. J Theor Appl Inf Technol. 2020;98(15):2948–62.
12. Ellegaard O. The application of bibliometric analysis: disciplinary and user aspects. Scientometrics. 2018;116(1):181–202.
13. Mukherjee D, Lim WM, Kumar S, Donthu N. Guidelines for advancing theory and practice through bibliometric research. J Bus Res. 2022;148:101–15.
14. Lim WM, Kumar S. Guidelines for interpreting the results of bibliometric analysis: a sensemaking approach. Glob Bus Organ Excell. 2024;43(2):17–26.
15. Fetscherin M, Usunier JC. Corporate branding: an interdisciplinary literature review. Eur J Mark. 2012;46(5):733–53.
16. Paganin L, Borsato M. A critical review of design for reliability—a bibliometric analysis and identification of research opportunities. Procedia Manuf. 2017;11:1421–8.
17. Li J, Mao Y, Ouyang J, Zheng S. A review of urban microclimate research based on CiteSpace and VOSviewer analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(8):4741.
18. Llanos-Herrera GR, Merigo JM. Overview of brand personality research with bibliometric indicators. Kybernetes. 2019;48(3):546–69.
19. Van Eck NJ, Waltman L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics. 2010;84(2):523–38.
20. Jamshidi A, Rahimi SA, Ait-Kadi D, Ruiz A. A comprehensive fuzzy risk-based maintenance framework for prioritization of medical devices. Appl Soft Comput. 2015;32:322–34.
21. Arzaghi E, Abaei MM, Abbassi R, Garaniya V, Chin C, Khan F. Risk-based maintenance planning of subsea pipelines through fatigue crack growth monitoring. Eng Fail Anal. 2017;79:928–39.
22. Kaewunruen S, Sresakoolchai J, Ma W, Phil-Ebosie O. Digital twin aided vulnerability assessment and risk-based maintenance planning of bridge infrastructures exposed to extreme conditions. Sustainability (Basel). 2021;13(4):2051.
23. Leoni L, BahooToroody A, De Carlo F, Paltrinieri N. Developing a risk-based maintenance model for a natural gas regulating and metering station using Bayesian network. J Loss Prev Process Ind. 2019;57:17–24.
24. Cullum J, Binns J, Lonsdale M, Abbassi R, Garaniya V. Risk-based maintenance scheduling with application to naval vessels and ships. Ocean Eng. 2018;148:476–85.
25. Dehghani NL, Darestani YM, Shafieezadeh A. Optimal life-cycle resilience enhancement of aging power distribution systems: a MINLP-based preventive maintenance planning. IEEE Access. 2020;8:22324–34.
26. Khan F, Yarveisy R, Abbassi R. Risk-based pipeline integrity management: a road map for the resilient pipelines. J Pipeline Sci Eng. 2021;1(1):74–87.
27. Jaderi F, Ibrahim ZZ, Zahiri MR. Criticality analysis of petrochemical assets using risk-based maintenance and the fuzzy inference system. Process Saf Environ Prot. 2019;121:312–25.
28. Van Eck NJ, Waltman L. VOSviewer manual. Leiden: Univ Leiden; 2018.
29. Afshari SS, Enayatollahi F, Xu X, Liang X. Machine learning-based methods in structural reliability analysis: a review. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 2022;219:108223.
30. Wang C, Beer M, Ayyub BM. Time-dependent reliability of aging structures: overview of assessment methods. ASCE-ASME J Risk Uncertain Eng Syst A Civ Eng. 2021;7(4):03121003.
31. Nahal M, Khelif R. Failure probability assessment for pipelines under the corrosion effect. Am J Mech Eng. 2014;2(1):15–20.
32. Dundulis G, Žutautaitė I, Janulionis R, Ušpuras E, Rimkevičius S, Eid M. Integrated failure probability estimation based on structural integrity analysis and failure data: natural gas pipeline case. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 2016;156:195–202.
33. Tan Z, Li J, Wu Z, Zheng J, He W. An evaluation of maintenance strategy using risk-based inspection. Saf Sci. 2011;49(6):852–60.
34. Zou G, Faber MH, González A, Banisoleiman K. A holistic approach to risk-based decision on inspection and design of fatigue-sensitive structures. Eng Struct. 2020;221:110949.
35. Tubis A, Werbińska-Wojciechowska S, Sliwinski P, Zimroz R. Fuzzy risk-based maintenance strategy with safety considerations for the mining industry. Sensors (Basel). 2022;22(2):441.
36. Chemweno P, Pintelon L, Muchiri PN, Van Horenbeek A. Risk assessment methodologies in maintenance decision making: a review of dependability modelling approaches. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 2018;173:64–77.
37. Fernández PMG, López AJG, Márquez AC, Fernández JFG, Marcos JA. Dynamic risk assessment for CBM-based adaptation of maintenance planning. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 2022;223:108359.
38. Louhichi R, Sallak M, Pelletan J. A cost model for predictive maintenance based on risk-assessment. In: Proc CIGI QUALITA. 2019.
39. Chen C, Lu N, Jiang B, Wang C. A risk-averse remaining useful life estimation for predictive maintenance. IEEE/CAA J Autom Sin. 2021;8(2):412–22.
| Files | ||
| Issue | Vol 16 No 3 (2024) | |
| Section | Review Article(s) | |
| Published | 2025-08-30 | |
| Keywords | ||
| Risk-Based Maintenance ·Safety. Bibliometric analysis · VOS viewer | ||
| Rights and permissions | |
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
