Feasibility of Substituting Ethylene with Sulfur Hexafluoride as a Tracer Gas in Hood Performance Test by ASHRAE-110-95 Method
,
Abstract
ANSI/ASHRAE 110-95 protocol is a widely acceptable method to assess the performance of laboratory hoods. In this test, sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) is applied as a tracer gas to quantitatively evaluate the performance of laboratory hoods. The environmentally hostile characteristics of SF6 as well as its cost are the major concerns. In the present study, the substitution of ethylene with SF6 in the ASHRAE 110-95 test method was investigated. Both SF6 and ethylene were applied to a laboratory hood at different face velocities and injection flow rates according to the ASHRAE 110-95 method. Meanwhile, the exposure of a mannequin stationed at the front of hood was measured. The concentration of tracer gases was measured using direct reading instruments. Linear regression of the results was used to consider the substitution of ethylene with SF6.The occupational exposure of the proposed hood operator to SF6 and ethylene were 4.2-7.3 ppm and 0.1 to 0.57 ppm respectively. SF6 exposure was increased significantly (p<0.001) by increasing the injected level while ethylene exposure was decreased significantly (p<0.001). The linear correlation between the leakage levels of two tracer gases at the injected flow rate of 4 lit/min did not fit well with experimental data. Ethylene is not recommended as a substitution for SF6 in ASHRAE 110-95 hood performance test.
Golbabaei F, Esmaeilzadeh A, Rahimi A, Shahtaheri S. Evaluation of laboratory fume-hoods performance in a petrochemical industry based on ASHRAE 110 Standard. SJSPH 2008;6(4-3): 111-117.
Jacobs PJ. Laboratory fume hood performance. PhD thesis, Faculty of Health SciencesUniversity of White watersand, Johannesburg, South Africa, 2008.
Chen CW, Pan KL, Huang RF. Air-Curtain Hood Energy Saving Consideration. IOSH 2011;19: 210-222.
Tseng LC, Huang RF, Chen CC. Significance of face velocity fluctuation in relation to laboratory fume hood performance. Ind health 2010;48(1):43-51.
Greenley PL, Billings CE, DiBerardinis LJ, Edwards RW, Barkley WE. Containment testing of laboratory hoods in the as-used condition. Appl Occup Environ Hyg 2000; 15(2):209-216.
Karimi Zare A. Evaluation of laoratory hoods in Tehran Water and Waste water Co.MSc thesis, College of Occupatinal Hygiene, Islamic Azad university, Tehran, Iran, 2008.
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. Chemical Fume Hood Safety Protecting the Health of Laboratory Workers. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Report, May 2000.
Rydock JP. Tracer performance testing of installed fume hoods: One European perspective. JCHAS 2002;9(4):7-9.
Tseng L-C, Huang RF, Chih-ChiehChen, Chang C-P. Aerodynamics and Performance Verifications of Test Methods for Laboratory Fume Cupboards. Ann OccupHyg 2007; 51(2):173-187.
American National Standards Institute (ANSI) / American Society of Heating, Refriferating and Air Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE). Method of testng performance of laboratory fume hoods.(ASHRAE110-1995). American National Standards Institute Report Custom Standards Services, June 1995.
Burke M, Wong L, Gonzales BA, Knutson G. Nitrous Oxide as a Tracer Gas in the ASHRAE 110–1995 Standard. J Occup Environ Hyg 2014; 11(1):32-99.
Guffey EJ. Nitrous oxide as a substitute for sulfur hexafluoride in the ANSI/ASHRAE 110 Method of hood performance evaluation. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, USA, 2011.
Department of Industry, Innovation, Climate Change, Science, Research and Tertiary Education. National Greenhouse Accounts Factors, Commonwealth of Australia Report. July 2013.
AEA Energy & Environment. Climate Change Consequences of VOC Emission Controls. AEA Energy & Environment Report AEAT/ENV/R/2475 - Issue 3, ED48749102.September 2007.
American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers.Institute ANS. ASHRAE Standard Method of Testing Performance of Laboratory Fume Hoods. 1st edn. The Society Publishing, USA, 1995;pp 1-16.
Taylor, Scott and Tufts Climate Initiative. Fume Hood Study:Tufts University. Fume Hood Technologies and University Survey Report. July 2004.
Fahim MH. Advantages of using the ANSI/ASHRAE 110-1995 Tracer gas test method versus the ANSI/AIHA Z9. 5-1992 Face velocity test method for chemical laboratory hood certification. PhD thesis, University of Toledo, Ohio, USA, 2007.
Manual anemometer. 2012; Available from: http://www.tsi.com/airflow instruments-thermal-anemometer-ta2-range./
Maupins K, Hitchings DT. Reducing employee exposure potential using the ANSI/ASHRAE 110 Method of Testing Performance of Laboratory Fume Hoods as a diagnostic tool. Am Ind Hyg Assoc 1998;59(2):133-138.
Hitchings DT, Maupins K. Using the ASHRAE 110 test as a TQM tool to improve laboratory fume hood performance.Trans Am Soc Heat Refri Air Cond Eng1970;103:851-863.
UC Lab Safety Workgroup. Exploring the use of less environmentally damaging gases for use in tracer gas testing. UC Lab Safety Workgroup Report.October 2007.
UCSB Environmental Health and Safety.Chemical Fume Hood Guide: Design, Construction, Maintenance, Health and Safety. UCSB Environmental Health and Safety Report UCSB campus. September 2007.
American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA).American National Standard for Laboratory Ventilation. American Industrial Hygiene Association Report Subcommittee AAZ. August 2003.
| Files | ||
| Issue | Vol 6 No 1 (2014) | |
| Section | Original Article(s) | |
| Published | 2015-10-11 | |
| Keywords | ||
| Laboratory hood Tracer gas Ethylene SF6 | ||
| Rights and permissions | |
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
